Federalizing Aiports Essay -- Airport Security Government control Essa

Federalizing AiportsOn folk 11th, 2001, the joined States was dealt a devastating puff when our own airplanes were used as weapons of a terrorist attack. Within just days of the attack our nations leaders began debating over how we could solve our airport security problems. As citizens of the United States were avoiding airports, because they did not seem safe, the House and the Senate of the United States Congress argued whether or not airport security staff should become federal employees. The United States House representatives, and President George W. Bush, disagree with the fact that airport security should be federalized. After evaluating the Senates proposal the House found galore(postnominal) reasons as to why federalizing airport security is not logical. The proposal to federalize appeared to present many flaws. The fact that the proposition concentrates on passengers and ignores the thousands of caterers, cleaners, refuelers and others with access to airports and jets who lack mandatory screen background checks or ID cards (Why Federalizing Airport Security is a Bad Thing). With insufficient knowledge of the employees background or identification, another travesty, much like September 11th could occur whether security is federalized or not. The Senates solution to make matchless set of standards for the employees concerns the House. With the so-called one size fits all plan, there would be deficient security at many airports, because the sizes of our airports greatly vary. If standards were set to underwrite all major airports, such as Chicago OHare and John F. Kennedy airport in New York, then many small airports would be overwhelmed by the amount of security they are required to have. As the House declared a one size fits all soluti... ...h government intervention, the interests of the House exit also be met by not forcing all airports to federalize their employees. deeds CitedBook sourcesHahn, Robert. Risks, costs, and lives saved gettin g better results from regulation. New York Oxford University Press Washington, D.C. AEI Press, 1996. mesh sourcesThe Case Against Federalizing Airport Security. 20 October 2001. Richard W. Rahn. 13 November 2002. <http//www.cat.org/cgi-bin/scripts/printtech.cgi/dailys/10-20-01.html.Senator Clinton Calls on Congress To claim Senate Bill Federalizing Airport Security. 6 November 2001. Last viewed 13 November 2002. <http//clinton.senate.gov/news/2001/11/2001B07603.html.Why Federalizing Airport Security Is A Bad Idea. 24 October 2001. periodic Policy Digest. 13 November 2002. <http//www.ncpa.org/iss/ter/2001/pd102401a.html.